![]() This petition stems from the complaint for a sum of money filed by the Rural Bank of Tarlac, Inc., against Spouses Navarro. Spouses Augusto and Nora Navarro now come before this Court arguing that their appeal should not have been dismissed, since the issues they raised included questions of fact. The provision directs the dismissal of appeals filed through Rule 41 if they merely raise pure questions of law. The Court of Appeals (CA) dismissed 3 the appeal outright in light of Section 2, Rule 50 of the Rules of Court. The case before this Court concerns the availability of the remedy of an ordinary appeal under Rule 41 of the Rules of Court 1 in challenging the decision of the Regional Trial Court (RTC) 2 to resolve a case by way of a summary judgment.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |